Jun 30, 2020
Multiple Government Agencies Dispute NYT Report On Russian Putting Bounties On U.S. Troops
This news has been received from: dailywire.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
Multiple top government agencies released statements on Monday pushing back against the credibility of a recent New York Times report that claimed that President Donald Trump was briefed about a secret Russian military group that had allegedly offered bounties to militant fighters in Afghanistan for killing U.S. soldiers.
The Associated Press reported on Monday evening that the Trump administration allegedly knew about the alleged bounty on U.S. soldiers in 2019, a full year before the date that The New York Times reported.
“Over the past several days, the New York Times and other news outlets have reported on allegations regarding our troops in Afghanistan. While we do not normally discuss such matters, we constantly evaluate intelligence reports and brief the President as necessary,” National Security Advisor Robert C. O’Brien said in a statement. “Because the allegations in recent press articles have not been verified or substantiated by the Intelligence Community, President Trump had not been briefed on the items. Nevertheless, the Administration, including the National Security Council staff, have been preparing should the situation warrant action.”
“To those government officials who betray the trust of the people of the United States by leaking classified information, your actions endanger our national security. No matter the motivation, there is never a justification for such conduct,” O’Brien concluded. “Let me be clear that there is nothing more important to President Trump than America’s security and the safety of our men and women in uniform. He has demonstrated this commitment time and again.”
The Department of Defense (DOD) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) also put out statements on the matter, with the DOD saying that it has “no corroborating evidence to validate” the allegations in The New York Times’ report and ODNI saying that the leaks are criminal.
“The Department of Defense continues to evaluate intelligence that Russian GRU operatives were engaged in malign activity against United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan,” the DOD said in a statement. “To date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open-source reports. Regardless, we always take the safety and security of our forces in Afghanistan — and around the world — most seriously and therefore continuously adopt measures to prevent harm from potential threats.”
ODNI said that the selective leaking of any classified information “disrupts the vital interagency work to collect, assess, and mitigate threats and places our forces at risk. It is also, simply put, a crime.”
“We are still investigating the alleged intelligence referenced in recent media reporting and we will brief the President and Congressional leaders at the appropriate time,” ODNI continued. “This is the analytic process working the way it should. Unfortunately, unauthorized disclosures now jeopardize our ability to ever find out the full story with respect to these allegations.”
Related: NYT: Russians Paid Militants To Attack Americans And Trump Knew About It; Biden: ‘Betrayal’; Trump: ‘Never Briefed’
The Daily Wire, headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro, is a leading provider of conservative news, cutting through the mainstream media’s rhetoric to provide readers with the most important, relevant, and engaging stories of the day. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.
News Source: dailywire.com
Christian Cooper: Black birdwatcher in viral 911 connect with isnt going to want to be associated in prosecution, NYT reviews
“On the one hand, she’s previously compensated a steep rate,” Cooper said in a statement, in accordance to the Situations. “Which is not adequate of a deterrent to other folks? Bringing her additional misery just appears like piling on.”
Christian Cooper expressed his personal ambivalence with the prosecution in his assertion to the Moments.
“So if the DA feels the require to pursue rates, he ought to pursue fees. But he can do that without me,” he reported.An legal professional for Amy Cooper reported on Tuesday that she would be acquitted and decried the increase of “cancel society.”
“When all the facts are regarded, Amy Cooper will be uncovered not guilty of the one misdemeanor demand she faces,” lawyer Robert Barnes claimed in a assertion. “Centered on a misunderstood 60 seconds of movie, she lost her occupation, her dwelling and her reputation.
“General public shaming, misplaced work, denied advantages & now jail time for a mis-perceived, momentary alleged ‘wrong think’? For words said in a sixty next conversation in which even the alleged sufferer calls this reaction way too much? This criminalized, terminate culture is cancerous & precarious. That is why acquitting Amy Cooper is critical.”
Viral movie from May wellCooper was walking her doggy in Central Park in May perhaps when she encountered Christian Cooper in a wooded area acknowledged as the Ramble. A dispute commenced since her canine was not on a leash, opposite to the Ramble’s principles, both of them instructed CNN.Christian Cooper posted on Fb a portion of their trade that he filmed, which then was shared broadly as an additional illustration of White persons calling the law enforcement on Black people today for mundane items. In the recording, he is silent for the most aspect, when she frantically tells police he is threatening her and her pet.
“I’m having a image and calling the cops,” she is heard indicating in the movie. “I’m heading to explain to them you can find an African American male threatening my lifestyle.”READ White Home claims Trump and CDC are "quite considerably" on the exact page, in spite of tweets
In reviews to CNN in May well, Amy Cooper explained she needed to “publicly apologize to anyone.”
“I’m not a racist. I did not imply to damage that guy in any way,” she claimed, incorporating that she also failed to mean any hurt to the African American neighborhood.Christian Cooper has acknowledged her apology but reported her act was racist.
“I believe her apology is sincere,” Cooper advised CNN’s Don Lemon. “I am not positive that in that apology she recognizes that even though she may not be or look at herself a racist, that certain act was surely racist.”
CNN’s Kristina Sgueglia, Melanie Schuman, Theresa Waldrop, Amir Vera and Laura Ly contributed to this report.