Jul 01, 2020
Portland's Downtown Police Precinct Boarded Up
This news has been received from: usnews.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Workers have installed plywood over windows and washed off graffiti near the entrance to the downtown Portland police headquarters after police say windows were smashed and plywood was removed from doors.
The vandalism happened after the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office removed the last of the fencing that circled the Justice Center, the Police Bureau’s Central Precinct, police administrative offices, the county jail and courtrooms, to try to tamp down tension between protesters and police, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported.
Deputy Police Chief Chris Davis said Tuesday the fence had become much of the focus.
The fence was put up after May 29, when people smashed windows and set a fire inside a sheriff’s records office of the Justice Center. The barrier had become a flashpoint that draws demonstrators each night until early hours in a movement that coalesced in outrage at the May 25 death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Police have fired tear gas, tossed stun grenades, launched foam-tipped projectiles and pushed crowds out of the way with batons after declaring unlawful assemblies as some in the crowd have thrown bottles or fireworks at them.
People began the tagging about 1 a.m. and some used pieces of 2-by-4 lumber and a hammer to break windows, according to police and videos shared on social media. Some people tried to enter the precinct through the broken windows, police said.
Police responded and cleared people from the area. Independent writer Donovan Farley tweeted about 2:30 a.m. that police charged toward people, and he was “hit in the back several times trying to help someone who (Portland police) pushed into a car head first.”
Police confiscated some objects. Davis said an investigation is underway and police expect to make arrests. One 19-year-old was arrested, accused of setting a fire on the Justice Center steps.
Davis suggested that Multnomah County prosecutors and judges should “make the people who did this clean it all up and use restorative justice” to send a message that the community won’t tolerate the vandalism.
Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News Source: usnews.com
Men are more likely to be seen as 'brilliant' than women, and it's preventing gender equality at work, a study found
- A study found that people were more likely to associate the trait of brilliance with men over women.
- Researchers conducted tests to see who automatically associated brilliance with men and found that at least 70% of participants saw some association with men and brilliance.
- The study had 3,618 participants and went on for about four years.
- Visit Insider's homepage for more stories.
Despite decades of efforts to combat gender inequality in the workplace, people are more likely to associate the trait of brilliance with men over women, according to a new study.
The research, published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, involved five experiments in which over 3,000 people from 78 countries, including American children between nine and 10, were surveyed on what gender they most associated with "brilliance" (defined as "high level intellectual ability").
Few participants directly associated men with brilliance, but the surveys revealed 70% to 75% of people had "implicit bias" that suggested they more often associated brilliance with men than women.
"If people associate these traits that they see as essential for success with men more than women, then potentially, they're less likely to give women opportunities to succeed in these fields," study author Andrei Cimpian, associate professor in New York University's psychology department, told Insider.Many of the participants wouldn't not directly associate men with brilliance, but testing revealed implicit bias
In recent years, Cimpian's lab has dedicated itself to investigating reasons why women are underrepresented in certain fields, like science, technology, engineering and math, where traits like brilliance are valued.
A subject like this is complicated to research — while gender stereotypes were once widely accepted, most people are now wary to directly articulate them.
When Cimpian and his team asked their 3,618 participants if they associated brilliance with men more than women, many participants said they disagreed.
So Cimpian and his researchers used an Implicit Association Test in order to get their participants' views without explicitly asking them. The test asks people to sort stimuli, like a photo of a woman or a man, into categories as quickly as possible. The sorting is done by pressing the E or I letters on keyboards, and the categories could be "male" and "brilliant," or "female" and "brilliant."
The test measures how instinctively participants sort people into categories, like male into brilliant, to see who automatically groups those traits together, and how quickly that happens. (You can see a sample of an Implicit Association Test, created by one of Cimpian's co-authors, here.)
"The fact that these are implicit associations that people aren't able or willing to report on suggests that it may be a particularly pernicious obstacle to women," said Cimpian. "People might not even be aware of the fact that they hold these associations, so they might give more opportunities to men and evaluate male performance more positively without even realizing what they are doing."This study adds to a growing body of evidence showing men are seen as more brilliant than women
Data shows that women are still underrepresented in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine fields.
One 2016 study found that students more often used the terms brilliant and genius to describe male professors than they did female professors on RateMyProfessor.com, while a 2018 study found that people tend to refer more men than woman to jobs that require high intellectual ability.
And this bias begins at a young age. One 2019 study found that five and six year olds tended to choose photos of men over women when asked to select the photo of someone who was "really, really smart." Another 2018 study asked children to go through a pile of photos of children they didn't know and select "really, really smart" potential teammates for a game. They consistently selected boys.
"We're trying to understand what it is about these very prestigious careers, where people think that you need to be super smart to succeed, that makes the environment of these fields less welcoming to women," said Cimpian. "This is another piece of that puzzle, where we now know there's a stereotype that associates men more than women with these qualities, which is likely an obstacle to their success in the field."
11 surprising double standards that still exist for women in the US
CROSSFIT: Insiders reveal a sexist culture where founder Greg Glassman described his legal team as 'hot lawyer chicks' and where 'drawing penises on everything' was 'commonplace'
How much money a woman earns in her lifetime depends partially on how sexist people are in the state where she's born