Jul 01, 2020
Conservatives Praise Supreme Court for Ruling States Cant Discriminate Against Religious Schools
This news has been received from: tennesseestar.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
Hailed as a victory for religious freedom, the justices upheld a Montana scholarship program that allows state tax credits for private schooling in which almost all the recipients attend religious schools.
The Montana Supreme Court had struck down the K-12 private education scholarship program that was created by the Legislature in 2015 to make donors eligible for up to $150 in state tax credits. The state court had ruled that the tax credit violated the Montana constitution’s ban, called a Blaine Amendment, on state aid to religious schools.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion that said the state ruling itself ran afoul of the religious freedom, embodied in the U.S. Constitution, of parents who want the scholarships to help pay for their children’s private education.
“A state need not subsidize private education. But once a state decides to do so, it cannot disqualify some private schools solely because they are religious,” Roberts wrote.
In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito pointed to evidence of anti-Catholic bigotry that he said motivated the original adoption of the Montana provision and others like it in the 1800s, although Montana’s constitution was redone in 1972 with the provision intact. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, whose two daughters attend Catholic schools, made a similar point during arguments in January when he talked about the “grotesque religious bigotry” against Catholics that underlay the amendment.
U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr said in a statement that he was “pleased” with the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.
According to Barr, Montana’s Blaine Amendment – a provision found in various forms in many other states – excluded religious schools from state scholarship programs that are open to other educational institutions. It thus prevented parents who send their children to religious schools from receiving scholarship funds that are available to the rest of the community, he said.
“The Court’s decision represents an important victory for religious liberty and religious equality in the United States. As the Court explained, religious people are ‘members of the community too,’ and their exclusion from public programs because of their religion is ‘odious to our Constitution’ and ‘cannot stand.’ We were pleased to see the Court agree with the Trump Administration that such blatant discrimination against religion has no place in our constitutional system,” Barr added.
Aaron Baer, president of Citizens for Community Values, said it’s “troubling that four justices on the U.S. Supreme Court believe religious bigotry is acceptable.”
“Today’s Supreme Court decision affirms what everyone already knows: discrimination against these schools is un-American,” he said. “When the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of religion, it doesn’t elevate secularism above religion. It puts all worldviews on a level playing field. It was wrong for Montana – or any state – to penalize religious institutions because they are religious.”
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the ruling “removes one of the biggest obstacles to better educational opportunities for all children.”
“States may no longer hide behind rules motivated by insidious bias against Catholics, known as Blaine Amendments, to exclude religious schools from public benefits. Laws that condition public benefits, like need-based academic scholarships, on religious status demonstrate state-sanctioned hostility to religion, pressure people and institutions to censor their religious views, and stigmatize disfavored religions. The Trump Administration believes that school choice is a civil rights issue, and that no parent should be forced to send their child to a failing school,” she said.
U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos was more blunt, warning state leaders that “your bigoted Blaine Amendments and other restrictions like them are unconstitutional, dead, and buried.”
“I applaud the Court’s decision to assign a manifestation of the ‘last acceptable prejudice’ to the dustbin of history where it belongs,” she said in a statement. “Too many students have been discriminated against based on their faith and have been forced to stay in schools that don’t match their values. This decision represents a turning point in the sad and static history of American education, and it will spark a new beginning of education that focuses first on students and their needs.”
– – –
Anthony Gockowski is managing editor of The Minnesota Sun and The Ohio Star. Follow Anthony on Twitter. Email tips to [email protected]. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
News Source: tennesseestar.com
Customers are boycotting Goya in response to CEOs praise of Trump
Comments from the CEO of Goya Foods Robert Unanue have spurred a boycott of the company’s products.Hide
Unanue made comments in support of President Donald Trump at the Rose Garden Thursday. Noting that his business is the largest Hispanic-owned food company in America, the CEO praised the president for his abilities as “a builder.”Hide
“We’re all truly blessed at the same time to have a leader like President Trump who is a builder, and that’s what my grandfather did. He came to this country to build, to grow, to prosper,” Unanue said. “And so we have an incredible builder, and we pray for our leadership, our president, and we pray for our country that we will continue to prosper and to grow.”
Unanue’s words, intended as praise of the president’s executive order pledging to improve Hispanic Americans’ educational and economic access, soon prompted a new trend on Twitter. Within hours after his comments, both #Goya and #BoycottGoya were trending, along with #Goyaway.
The company’s customer base slammed Unanue for his praise of the president. Noting Trump’s history of damaging rhetoric and policies when it comes to the Latinx community, people took to Twitter to drag Unanue and announce their intent to boycott his business. A few high-level U.S. politicians even joined in. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) was quick to add her thoughts to the discussion.Hide
“Oh look, it’s the sound of me Googling ‘how to make your own Adobo,'” she wrote.Hide
Chrissy Teigen, who is also known for her cookbooks and cooking website, weighed in as well. She called Unanue’s comments “a shame.”
Boycotters emphasized the fact that the majority of Goya’s customer base is Latinx. Trump’s history with the Hispanic community—including calling Mexicans “rapists” and “criminals”—has been an argument in favor of the boycott.
“Don’t buy @GoyaFoods, it tastes like white supremacy,” one commenter wrote.Hide
@GoyaFoods supports child separation.@GoyaFoods supports building a border wall.@GoyaFoods supports migrant detention camps.@GoyaFoods supports the persecution and demonization of its own customer base.
Dont buy @GoyaFoods, it tastes like white supremacy. #BoycottGoyaFoods pic.twitter.com/LZPqltPurj