This news has been received from: Associated Press

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Who gets to be first in line for a COVID-19 vaccine? U.S. health authorities hope by late next month to have some draft guidance on how to ration initial doses, but it’s a vexing decision.

“Not everybody’s going to like the answer,” Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, recently told one of the advisory groups the government asked to help decide.

“There will be many people who feel that they should have been at the top of the list.”

Traditionally, first in line for a scarce vaccine are health workers and the people most vulnerable to the targeted infection.

But Collins tossed new ideas into the mix: Consider geography and give priority to people where an outbreak is hitting hardest.

And don’t forget volunteers in the final stage of vaccine testing who get dummy shots, the comparison group needed to tell if the real shots truly work.

“We owe them ... some special priority,” Collins said.

Huge studies this summer aim to prove which of several experimental COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. Moderna Inc. and Pfizer Inc. began tests last week that eventually will include 30,000 volunteers each; in the next few months, equally large calls for volunteers will go out to test shots made by AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax. And some vaccines made in China are in smaller late-stage studies in other countries.

Full Coverage: Racing for a Remedy

For all the promises of the U.S. stockpiling millions of doses, the hard truth: Even if a vaccine is declared safe and effective by year’s end, there won’t be enough for everyone who wants it right away -- especially as most potential vaccines require two doses.

It’s a global dilemma. The World Health Organization is grappling with the same who-goes-first question as it tries to ensure vaccines are fairly distributed to poor countries -- decisions made even harder as wealthy nations corner the market for the first doses.

In the U.S., the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is supposed to recommend who to vaccinate and when -- advice that the government almost always follows.

But a COVID-19 vaccine decision is so tricky that this time around, ethicists and vaccine experts from the National Academy of Medicine, chartered by Congress to advise the government, are being asked to weigh in, too.

Setting priorities will require “creative, moral common sense,” said Bill Foege, who devised the vaccination strategy that led to global eradication of smallpox. Foege is co-leading the academy’s deliberations, calling it “both this opportunity and this burden.”

With vaccine misinformation abounding and fears that politics might intrude, CDC Director Robert Redfield said the public must see vaccine allocation as “equitable, fair and transparent.”

How to decide? The CDC’s opening suggestion: First vaccinate 12 million of the most critical health, national security and other essential workers. Next would be 110 million people at high risk from the coronavirus -- those over 65 who live in long-term care facilities, or those of any age who are in poor health -- or who also are deemed essential workers. The general population would come later.

CDC’s vaccine advisers wanted to know who’s really essential. “I wouldn’t consider myself a critical health care worker,” admitted Dr. Peter Szilagyi, a pediatrician at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Indeed, the risks for health workers today are far different than in the pandemic’s early days. Now, health workers in COVID-19 treatment units often are the best protected; others may be more at risk, committee members noted.

Beyond the health and security fields, does “essential” mean poultry plant workers or schoolteachers? And what if the vaccine doesn’t work as well among vulnerable populations as among younger, healthier people? It’s a real worry, given that older people’s immune systems don’t rev up as well to flu vaccine.

With Black, Latino and Native American populations disproportionately hit by the coronavirus, failing to address that diversity means “whatever comes out of our group will be looked at very suspiciously,” said ACIP chairman Dr. Jose Romero, Arkansas’ interim health secretary.

Consider the urban poor who live in crowded conditions, have less access to health care and can’t work from home like more privileged Americans, added Dr. Sharon Frey of St. Louis University.

And it may be worth vaccinating entire families rather than trying to single out just one high-risk person in a household, said Dr. Henry Bernstein of Northwell Health.

Whoever gets to go first, a mass vaccination campaign while people are supposed to be keeping their distance is a tall order. During the 2009 swine flu pandemic, families waited in long lines in parking lots and at health departments when their turn came up, crowding that authorities know they must avoid this time around.

Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s effort to speed vaccine manufacturing and distribution, is working out how to rapidly transport the right number of doses to wherever vaccinations are set to occur.

Drive-through vaccinations, pop-up clinics and other innovative ideas are all on the table, said CDC’s Dr. Nancy Messonnier.

As soon as a vaccine is declared effective, “we want to be able the next day, frankly, to start these programs,” Messonnier said. “It’s a long road.”


The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

News Source: Associated Press

Tags: covid 19 vaccine

New Study Finds Reporters In DC Might Be More Insular Than Previously Thought

Next News:

Trump Campaign Pressures Debate Commission To Host First Debate In September, Before Early Voting Starts

Rudy Giuliani and the Trump 2020 campaign urged the Commission on Presidential Debates to host the first 2020 debate in early September, before states commence early voting.

Giuliani, the president’s personal attorney, sent a letter Wednesday asking for the date of the final debate to be changed from October 22 to early September if the Commission doesn’t approve the Trump campaign’s request to add a fourth debate to the schedule. Axios first reported on the request. (RELATED: ‘No Way’ — Top Republicans Kill Trump’s Hopes For A Delayed 2020 Election)

BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP, NJ – NOVEMBER 20: (L to R) President-elect Donald Trump and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Giuliani wrote that by the first debate in late September is held, up to 8 million Americans in 16 different states might have already cast ballots in the election. He added that by the time of the vice presidential debate, currently scheduled for October 7, 20 million voters in 24 states could have already cast ballots.

Giuliani’s letter came just 2 days after new Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien publicly stated a desire to move up the debate schedule.

“We want more debates, we want debates starting sooner,” he stated during an interview on Fox News. “That’s a concern to me. I want to see President Trump on the debate stage against Joe Biden.”

Stepien accused the “liberal left” of finding excuses to keep Biden off the debate stage.

“We’re already seeing the liberal left, the liberal media trying to create trap doors for Joe Biden to escape his commitment and obligations to debate Donald Trump on a debate stage in front of the American people.”

He further stated during the same interview that he doesn’t pay attention to national and state polls showing Trump trailing Biden.

“I don’t get caught up in the daily horse race,” Stepien explained. “The pollsters got it wrong in 2016 from July through November of 2016. There were 226 national public polls. Clinton led in 213 of the 226.”

Other News

  • Commission rejects Trump request for 4th presidential debate
  • Debate commission rejects Trump push for extra showdown with Biden
  • Commission on Presidential Debates rejects Trump campaign call for earlier debate
  • University Of Minn. Begins 1st Clinical Trial To Test If Natural Killer Cells Can Be Effective Treatment For COVID-19
  • GMs push to compete with Tesla begins with Cadillac Lyriq crossover debut Thursday
  • NYC begins registering travelers at COVID-19 checkpoints
  • GM's push to compete with Tesla begins with Cadillac Lyriq crossover debut Thursday
  • The Latest: Koepka Begins Bid for 3rd Straight PGA Title
  • The Latest: PGA Championship begins in chill and quiet
  • Trump Campaign Requests Changes For First Debate With Joe Biden
  • Blame for Beirut Explosion Begins With a Leaky, Troubled Ship
  • AccuWeather forecast: Rebound begins today
  • Computer Exchange And Distribution For Pittsburgh Public School Students Begins Today
  • NBCUniversal begins layoffs, cuts expected to be kept under 10%
  • Nevada Begins Tracking Pandemic's Effect on LGBTQ Community
  • Trump campaign calls for a fourth presidential debate, citing early voting
  • Trump Campaign Wants Presidential Debate in Early September
  • Free Antibody Testing Event Begins At Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza
  • Trump requests fourth presidential debate with an earlier date for the first showdown